Side-By-Side Boxplot vs Comparative Dotplot

Both terms below come up in the same part of the course, and students mix them up. Here is each one defined on its own, side by side, so you can see where they part company.

Side-by-side boxplot

Graphs and displays

A side-by-side boxplot draws one boxplot per group on a shared scale, so you can compare center, spread, and skew across groups at a glance.

A side-by-side boxplot puts one boxplot per group along the same axis, so a difference in center reads as a shift and a difference in spread reads as a wider or narrower box. For example, if class A has median 78 with Q1=70Q_1 = 70 (the first quartile) and Q3=84Q_3 = 84 (the third quartile), while class B has median 85 with Q1=81Q_1 = 81 and Q3=89Q_3 = 89, then B sits 7 points higher with a smaller interquartile range (IQR) of 8981=889 - 81 = 8 against A's 8470=1484 - 70 = 14. This site computes quartiles with the median-excluded (TI-84) rule. Because each box is built from only five numbers, a side-by-side boxplot can hide a gap, a cluster, or a second peak that a dotplot would show.

Full entry for side-by-side boxplot

Comparative dotplot

Graphs and displays

A comparative dotplot stacks two or more dotplots on the same number line so their centers, spreads, and shapes can be compared directly.

Because every dot is still one observation, a comparative dotplot compares groups without summarizing anything away, so gaps, clusters, and repeated values stay visible. For example, group A with values 4, 5, 5, 6 and group B with values 3, 5, 5, 7 share the same mean of 20/4=520 / 4 = 5, but B has a range of 73=47 - 3 = 4 against A's 64=26 - 4 = 2. A side-by-side boxplot would also show that difference in spread, but it would hide the fact that both groups pile up at 5. Comparative dotplots work best for small data sets, since with hundreds of points the stacks grow too tall to read.

Full entry for comparative dotplot

Where each one fits in the course